BPC-157 and TB-500 stacked for a partial tear, is running both justified or is BPC alone enough?

Partial bicep tear from three weeks ago. MRI confirmed it, not a full rupture. Ordered BPC-157 and TB-500. My question is whether running both is actually justified or whether BPC alone at the correct dose handles it. I understand BPC works locally and TB-500 works systemically. What doses are people running for a structural injury rather than just soft tissue soreness? Looking for actual experience reports not theoretical pharmacology.

BPC plus TB-500 for a hamstring partial tear last year. Eight weeks in and back to full training. The combination works for real structural injuries. Would not skip either compound for anything beyond minor soft tissue soreness.

TB-500 systemic mechanism is well documented. For a structural injury the combination approach is clearly justified by the pharmacology. Local repair from BPC plus systemic tissue environment support from TB-500 addresses both components.

BPC-157 protocol for a serious injury: 500mcg per day subcutaneous at the site. I ran this for 8 weeks for a partial pectoral tear and returned to training 4 weeks ahead of the surgeon projection. The combination with TB-500 is justified for structural injuries.

I had a knee ligament partial tear and ran BPC plus TB-500 for 8 weeks. Return to full training was faster than the physiotherapist projected. The combination works and neither compound should be skipped for a serious structural injury.

BAC water sourcing in France has become more complicated in the past year. I order from a medical supply company now. The reconstitution process itself is straightforward once the water is obtained - do not let sourcing delay starting the protocol.