Test prop vs test e for a 10 week cut, which makes more sense

[NYCgains]

Planning a summer cut, 10 weeks. Debating test prop vs test e for this run. I know prop clears faster which is useful if you want to get back to TRT quick, but the EOD pinning gets old. My test e TRT baseline runs smooth so I trust the compound. Anyone cut with prop and find it worth the extra injection frequency? Or is test e just easier to manage and close enough?

[Jock]

Test e for a cut every time. The EOD pinning of prop adds friction to what is already a mentally tough phase of training. The serum level difference over a 10 week period is minimal. Unless you are competing and need to clear fast I would not bother with prop.

[Mick AU]

Agree with Jock. Prop made sense when people were doing short cycles to minimise detection time. For a 10 week cut with no competition there is no practical benefit. Stick with test e.

[Beantown Rick]

Only reason I would go prop is if you want to dial in your AI protocol quickly - shorter ester means E2 responds faster to dose changes. But for a regular cut cycle that advantage does not outweigh the pinning hassle. Test e is the call.

[MunichMarc]

What is the typical PIP like with test prop? I have heard it is worse than long esters. Is that true across the board or does it depend on the carrier oil and concentration?