Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: Test 400

  1. #11
    Just given my mate some Test400, its his first time doing roids and he did his 1ml injection on tuesday and hes already reporting better libido and sleep. also i have noticed some slight change in his arms, not much however yet. he is prone to moon face so will maybe need some calcium d gluracate?

  2. #12
    stuffs legit, used at 2cc per week for 8 weeks. Good strength, good fullness, little high estro but what do you expect. No pip. Recomped quickly at 218-220 lbs. Was using it solo. Now i am on 0.7cc per week, one stanavar per day, clen and t3. Still getting stronger, not getting flat. No bunk here

  3. #13
    Could be used for TRT? I am used to do subq injection with testosteron enant since 1 year. Would this test be a god choice?

  4. #14
    MTS STAFF - formally MR BIG BIGDADDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    2,324
    Blog Entries
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodycastro View Post
    Could be used for TRT? I am used to do subq injection with testosteron enant since 1 year. Would this test be a god choice?
    I wouldn't. You want something that is only a long ester. Like Test-E.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by SMonMTS View Post
    stuffs legit, used at 2cc per week for 8 weeks. Good strength, good fullness, little high estro but what do you expect. No pip. Recomped quickly at 218-220 lbs. Was using it solo. Now i am on 0.7cc per week, one stanavar per day, clen and t3. Still getting stronger, not getting flat. No bunk here
    I do not understand the point of 0.7cc that is a little ocd just make it 1cc mate and we will all be happy

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by ironmaster View Post
    I do not understand the point of 0.7cc that is a little ocd just make it 1cc mate and we will all be happy
    not really, i wanted lower than 400/wk and higher than 200/wk. Ocd would be trying to hit 0.75 cc on the dot

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by SMonMTS View Post
    not really, i wanted lower than 400/wk and higher than 200/wk. Ocd would be trying to hit 0.75 cc on the dot
    You will notice 0 difference in 300mg / 400mg.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by BBJMD View Post
    You will notice 0 difference in 300mg / 400mg.
    so why is there any disadvantage to use less then?

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by SMonMTS View Post
    so why is there any disadvantage to use less then?
    pulling specifically .75ml consistently is not possible. you have space between the needle and .1ml which is arguably around .2ml depending on the barrel, as well as the difference in depth of the end of the plunger, as well as human error. So your idea of exact measurements is nothing but a pipe dream, rounding up or down to the nearest 0.5mg is common practice to avoid hormone spikes via peaks and troughs in your volume. Take it from someone with years of experience.

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by BBJMD View Post
    pulling specifically .75ml consistently is not possible. you have space between the needle and .1ml which is arguably around .2ml depending on the barrel, as well as the difference in depth of the end of the plunger, as well as human error. So your idea of exact measurements is nothing but a pipe dream, rounding up or down to the nearest 0.5mg is common practice to avoid hormone spikes via peaks and troughs in your volume. Take it from someone with years of experience.
    didnt i just say i wasnt being exact .... jesus

    i have some fat fuck and now you getting on at me for no reason

    i simply pulled roughly in between 0.5 and 1.0 cc. If it is the same each time there are no wild fluctuations (+/- human error WHICH YOU GET ANYWAY WHEN PULLING TO THE NEAREST CC OR 0.5CC)

    My post was simply to give confidence to people who are still on the fence about using mts

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •