MTS Primo 100mg review - noticed it week 3, exactly what it says on the tin
4 posts · started by Jock · Jan 4, 2025
Posts: 1,016
Joined: Mar 2015
Rep: 10
👤
Jock
1,016 posts · joined Mar 2015
Jan 4, 2025 at 12:00 AM
#1
MTS Primo 100mg, 10 weeks in at 400mg per week alongside 500mg test e. Noticed it at week 3 as advertised. Steady lean muscle gain, no water, no bloating. Dry gains only. The cost makes it hard to justify running heavy but at 400mg it does exactly what primo is supposed to do. No pip, consistent oil. Good product, would run again.
Posts: 463
Joined: Aug 2017
Rep: 10
👤
Mick AU
463 posts · joined Aug 2017
Jan 6, 2025 at 12:00 AM
#2
Quality primo at 400mg alongside test is one of the best stacks available when you can justify the cost. Dry gains with that level of quality are worth it for a show prep. Good to have a reliable review of the MTS batch - consistent with what I have seen from them.
Posts: 466
Joined: Mar 2016
Rep: 10
👤
Davo
466 posts · joined Mar 2016
Jan 8, 2025 at 12:00 AM
#3
Noticed at week 3 is consistent with every reliable primo source I have used. Any earlier and I would question whether it is actually primo or something mixed in. The gradual onset is part of the compound's character. Good product.
Posts: 1,336
Joined: Feb 2015
Rep: 10
👤
FLbodybuilder
1,336 posts · joined Feb 2015
Jan 10, 2025 at 12:00 AM
#4
Was planning primo for spring but the price increase has me reconsidering. If MTS is still holding quality it might still be worth it for the prep phase even at current prices. Thanks for the update - helpful to know it is still consistent.