Found my personal test ceiling at 900mg, above that the sides just pile on regardless of what you do

15 posts · started by TEXMEX · Jan 24, 2025

👤
TEXMEX
Member
Posts: 334
Joined: May 2017
Rep: 10
👤
TEXMEX
334 posts · joined May 2017
#1
Ran 1.2g test last blast thinking more is more. Biggest mistake I've made in years. Water retention was out of control even with E2 at 28 pg/mL. Skin was bad. Mood was garbage in ways that had nothing to do with estrogen. Dropped back to 750mg this current blast and everything is tight, gains are comparable, quality of life is night and day. 750mg is my ceiling and I'm staying there. Curious if others found a similar hard limit where the compound just stops cooperating.
👤
Beantown Rick
Posts: 552
Joined: Jun 2016
Rep: 10
👤
Beantown Rick
552 posts · joined Jun 2016
#2
750mg is my ceiling and I've tested above it twice to confirm. At 1g the non-E2 water retention becomes its own problem - AI doesn't touch it because it's androgen-driven not estrogen-driven. Skin goes bad, mood gets harder to manage. 750mg with E2 dialled in gives me everything I want from a blast without fighting the sides. Above that the marginal gains stop being worth it.
👤
Chi Guy
Posts: 669
Joined: Apr 2015
Rep: 10
👤
Chi Guy
669 posts · joined Apr 2015
#3
Chicago guys I know who've been competing for 20 years mostly land between 600 and 800mg as their practical ceiling. A few outliers push higher but the quality of life tradeoffs above 1g are consistent - skin, water, mood, sleep. The receptor saturation argument is real too: above a certain dose the marginal anabolic signal per milligram drops off while side effects continue scaling linearly. Individual variation exists but 750-800mg covers the upper end of sensible for most people.
👤
AucklandA
Posts: 122
Joined: Aug 2019
Rep: 10
👤
AucklandA
122 posts · joined Aug 2019
#4
Good thread. As someone still working their way up through doses this is useful framing. I'm at 600mg currently and results are solid. Will probably try 750mg next blast to see the difference but reading this I'm not planning to go much higher than that. The quality of life argument is more persuasive than the diminishing returns argument for me personally.
👤
Geoff K
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Feb 2020
Rep: 10
👤
Geoff K
106 posts · joined Feb 2020
#5
At intermediate level this is really useful to read. I've never tracked exactly where my ceiling is but 600mg is where I've felt most comfortable. The non-E2 water retention above 1g being unmanageable is something I didn't know was a separate mechanism from estrogen management - that explains a lot about why some guys look terrible at higher doses even with good bloodwork.
👤
ScouseLad
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Jun 2023
Rep: 10
👤
ScouseLad
42 posts · joined Jun 2023
#6
so basically for a first cycle nobody should be worrying about dose ceilings yet, got it. good thread though - useful to know where the limits are before you get there rather than finding out the hard way
👤
NYCgains
Posts: 237
Joined: Nov 2019
Rep: 10
👤
NYCgains
237 posts · joined Nov 2019
#7
My ceiling is around 800mg. Above that the skin gets bad in a way that doesn't respond to any AI or topical management. Tried 1g twice and both times quality of life dropped noticeably. The androgen receptor saturation argument is real - above a certain threshold you're just adding sides not adding anabolic signal.
👤
OhioStrong
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Mar 2023
Rep: 10
👤
OhioStrong
53 posts · joined Mar 2023
#8
Way too early for me to worry about ceilings but the non-E2 water retention mechanism is something I'd never heard of. Good to know that above certain doses there's a problem you literally can't AI your way out of. Filing that away for when it becomes relevant.
👤
HighAltitude
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Sep 2022
Rep: 10
👤
HighAltitude
68 posts · joined Sep 2022
#9
Useful framing for someone still figuring out where they land. I'm only at 400mg currently and that's working well without major sides. The idea that above 750-1000mg you're fighting androgen-driven problems that AI can't fix is a good reason not to chase higher doses just for the sake of it.
👤
SydneyFit
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Mar 2020
Rep: 10
👤
SydneyFit
113 posts · joined Mar 2020
#10
At 600mg currently and sides are manageable. The non-E2 water above 1g is something I hadn't understood as a separate mechanism. Explains a lot about guys who look puffy even with their E2 dialled in. Probably won't push above 750mg based on this - no compelling reason to when the results at current dose are solid.
👤
BERLINER
Posts: 516
Joined: Sep 2016
Rep: 10
👤
BERLINER
516 posts · joined Sep 2016
#11
I have data across seven blast cycles tracking testosterone dose against recorded body composition metrics and subjective side effect severity. The non-linear relationship above 750mg is visible in my own numbers. Marginal anabolic output per additional 100mg drops noticeably above that threshold while side effect severity continues to increase proportionally. 700mg is my personal optimum based on this data.
👤
MunichMarc
Posts: 278
Joined: Dec 2018
Rep: 10
👤
MunichMarc
278 posts · joined Dec 2018
#12
My experience matches the 700-800mg ceiling that others describe. Above that dose the water retention became noticeable even with E2 well controlled. Skin quality worsened. The gains did not meaningfully increase. I have stayed at 600-700mg since and the results are actually better because I can maintain the condition properly throughout the cycle.
👤
SWE LIFTS
Member
Posts: 152
Joined: Jul 2018
Rep: 10
👤
SWE LIFTS
152 posts · joined Jul 2018
#13
My data across five blasts shows 700-750mg as the optimal range for me personally. At 800mg the sleep quality drops noticeably - not from E2, confirmed with labs showing E2 in range, but from androgen load itself. Sleep is a performance variable that directly hits training quality so above 750mg becomes counterproductive in my experience despite the higher anabolic dose.
👤
OsloFit
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: May 2022
Rep: 10
👤
OsloFit
45 posts · joined May 2022
#14
Useful context for someone still on low doses. I am at 300mg currently and sides are minimal. The idea that there is a ceiling where non-E2 problems become unmanageable is good to know before pushing higher. No reason to chase higher doses if the current dose is working without problems.
👤
Paris GH
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Mar 2018
Rep: 10
👤
Paris GH
164 posts · joined Mar 2018
#15
My ceiling is around 600mg. Above that the aesthetic quality of my physique actually worsens - water retention and skin issues outweigh the additional anabolic signal. The French approach to physique sports values leanness and proportion over raw mass, which aligns with staying at doses where you can maintain clean condition rather than pushing higher and fighting the consequences.
Reply

📦 Move Thread

✂️ Split Thread Here

This post and all following posts will become a new thread.