Planning first cycle at 300mg test e instead of 500mg, is this a proper blast or too conservative?
11 posts · started by OsloFit · Mar 13, 2026
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: May 2022
Rep: 10
👤
OsloFit
45 posts · joined May 2022
Mar 13, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#1
Planning my first cycle and I was thinking 300mg test e per week instead of the standard 500mg recommendation. My reasoning is that I want to see how I respond before going higher. I have read that some people do very well at lower doses. Is 300mg actually a proper cycle or is it pointless compared to 500mg? I want to do this carefully and not jump straight to a high dose.
Posts: 466
Joined: Mar 2016
Rep: 10
👤
Davo
466 posts · joined Mar 2016
Mar 14, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#2
300mg is a real cycle mate. Not as aggressive as 500 but you will see results and you will learn how you respond without jumping to a dose that might hit harder than you are ready for. Sensible starting point.
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Feb 2020
Rep: 10
👤
Geoff K
106 posts · joined Feb 2020
Mar 15, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#3
300mg is fine for a first cycle. I started at 400mg myself and had solid results. You do not have to go to 500mg right away, especially if you want to understand how you respond to the compound before adding more variables.
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Jun 2023
Rep: 10
👤
ScouseLad
42 posts · joined Jun 2023
Mar 16, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#4
i was gonna do 300 aswell but loads of ppl said just do 500 its the same risk anyway. went with 500 in the end. good luck with whatever you decide
Posts: 237
Joined: Nov 2019
Rep: 10
👤
NYCgains
237 posts · joined Nov 2019
Mar 17, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#5
300mg is a proper cycle. You will see solid results and have a cleaner first experience than jumping to 500. Starting lower and learning how you respond is the right approach before adding more.
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Mar 2023
Rep: 10
👤
OhioStrong
53 posts · joined Mar 2023
Mar 18, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#6
I started at 500mg. Looking back, 400mg would have been fine for a first cycle. Your logic of starting lower and seeing how you respond is sound. You are not leaving massive gains on the table going at 300-400mg first time.
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Sep 2022
Rep: 10
👤
HighAltitude
68 posts · joined Sep 2022
Mar 19, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#7
300mg is a sensible starting point. I started at 350mg for the same reason. Saw solid results and now I understand how I respond before going higher. You do not have to hit 500mg on a first cycle.
Posts: 463
Joined: Aug 2017
Rep: 10
👤
Mick AU
463 posts · joined Aug 2017
Mar 20, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#8
Reckon 300mg is a solid first cycle choice mate. You will still see real results and you will understand how your body handles it before going higher. No need to jump to 500 on the first run.
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Mar 2020
Rep: 10
👤
SydneyFit
113 posts · joined Mar 2020
Mar 21, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#9
Starting lower and working up makes sense. I would go 400mg if I was doing it again for the first time rather than jumping straight to 500. Your approach is solid.
Posts: 278
Joined: Dec 2018
Rep: 10
👤
MunichMarc
278 posts · joined Dec 2018
Mar 22, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#10
I planned a 400mg first cycle for the same reason you are thinking 300. Ended up going 450mg. Results were solid and I now know how I respond. Starting conservative is correct thinking.
Posts: 122
Joined: Aug 2019
Rep: 10
👤
AucklandA
122 posts · joined Aug 2019
Mar 23, 2026 at 8:00 AM
#11
Starting conservative is smart. I would not go below 300mg but starting there rather than jumping to 500 makes sense for understanding your individual response before committing to higher doses.